Video: Timing Tails & Buffers

Timing and synchronisation have always been a fundamental aspect of TV and as we move to IP, we see that timing is just as important. Whilst there are digital workflows that don’t need to be synchronised against each other, many do such as studio productions. However, as we see in this talk from The Broadcast Bridge’s Tony Orme, IP networks make timing all the more variable and accounting for this is key to success.

To start with Tony looks at the way the OBs, also known as REMIs, are moving to IP and need a timing plane across all of the different parts of production. We see how traditionally synchronisation is needed and the effect of timing problems not only in missed data but also with all essences being sent separately synchronisation problems between them can easily creep in.

When it comes to IP timing itself, Tony explains how PTP is used to record the capture time of the media/essences and distribute through the system. Looking at the data on the wire and the interval between that and the last will show a distribution of, hopefully, a few microseconds variation. This variation gives rise to jitter which is a varying delay in data arrival. The larger the spread, the more difficult it will be to recover data. To examine this more closely, Tony looks at the reasons for and the impacts of congestion, jitter, reordering of data.

Bursting, to make one of these as an example, is a much overlooked issue on networks. While it can occur in many scenarios without any undue problems, microbusting can be a major issue and one that you need to look for to find. This surrounds the issue of how you decide that a data flow is, say, 500Mbps. If you had an encoder which sent data at 1Gbps for 5 minutes and no data for 5 minutes, then over the 10 minute window, the average bitrate would have been 500Mbps. This clearly isn’t a 500Mbps encoder, but how narrow do you need to have your measurement window to be happy it is, indeed, 500Mbps by all reasonable definitions? Do you need to measure it over 1 second, 1 millisecond? Behind microbursting is the tendency of computers to send whatever data they have as quickly as possible; if a computer has a 10Gbe NIC, then it will send at 10Gbps. What video receivers actually need is well spaced packets which always come a set time apart.

Buffers a necessary for IP transmission, in fact within a computer there are many buffers. So using and understanding buffers is very important. Tony takes us through the thought process of considering what buffers are and why we need them. With this groundwork laid, understanding their use and potential problems is easier and well illustrated in this talk. For instance, since there are buffers in many parts of the chain to send data from an application to a NIC and have it arrive at the destination, the best way to maximise the chances of having a deterministic delay in the Tx path is to insert PTP information almost at the point of egress in the NIC rather than in the application itself.

The talk concludes by looking at buffer fill models and the problems that come with streaming using TCP/IP rather then UDP/IP (or RTP). The latter being the most common.

Watch now!
Download the presentations!

Speakers

Tony Orme Tony Orme
Editor,
The Broadcast Bridge

Meeting: IBC 2018 Review


Date: Wednesday 17th October 2018, 18:30 BST
Location: Central Studio, Queen Marys College, Cliddesden Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3HF

Did you miss IBC this year or only have time to see half? Come to the joint meeting with the RTS Thames Valley and RTS Southern Centre and you will be able to catch up on all the highlights and discuss the hot topics this year with this panel of experienced attendees.

Register Now!

Speakers:

Chair: Tony Orme
Vice Chairman, RTS Thames Valley
Martin Parsons
Consultant and trainer for the broadcast, post-production and motion picture industries
Ciaran Doran Ciaran Doran
Exec VP Global Sales & Marketing, Pixel Power
Neil Maycock Neil Maycock
VP Global Marketing, Grass Valley, a Belden Brand
Russell Trafford-Jones Russell Trafford-Jones
Manager, Support & Services, Techex

Meeting: Is 2110 the Future of Broadcasting?


Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 18:30. SMPTE’s ST2110 is the most important advance in television since John Logie Baird went head to head with EMI-Marconi in the BBC’s 1936 trials at Alexandra Palace, London. In this joint meeting between SMPTE and RTS Thames Valley:

  • What is ST2110?
  • Why is it so important to the future of broadcasting?
  • Will Television will now become software?
  • What are the ramifications for traditional hardware manufacturers?
  • Where does the cloud fit in?

Tony Orme, writer of ‘Building IP Media Facilities’ and for The Broadcast Bridge, answers these questions and many more he digs deeper into IP and its resurgence in popularity.

Registration closes today, 9th March.

Meeting: AES67 audio over IP within SMPTE ST-2110

Date:Thursday, November 16, 2017 – 18:00 to 20:30
Location: Universisty of Surrey, Wates House, GU2 7XH, Guildford Map

Peter Stevens (BBC R&D) will cover AES67 and its background development within AES and how it is connected as a audio elements within SMPTE 2110. The basic operational principles of AES67 will be described in relation to its various technology components and history of audio over IP. It will conclude with a brief look at the plugfests that have taken place, along with some examples of use within broadcasting.

There is be an introduction by Tony Orme (Uni of Surrey) covering the structure of ST 2110 and its relationship with ST 2057 PTP and discovery etc. like NMOS and how it differs fundamentally from ST 2022-6 and SDI with embeded audio.

Register